UTTER RUBBISH!
Now are you done mashing up the culture and artform? Are you trying to be the saviour? Gimme ah Break!
The hypocrisy of people!
An artiste can create five, ten or even more songs in a year, and because one of those songs wasn’t used in a competition, we expect them to simply throw it away? Then we wonder why upcoming artistes are no longer fully investing in their creative abilities.
Instead, we are seeing more reliance on AI, samples and recycled material. Some individuals aren’t even singing anymore—they are performing over samples! And somehow, we want to police the very creativity we should be encouraging?
Let’s put this into perspective.
Some of the greatest artistes in the entertainment industry never felt pressured to produce a hit every single year. They could release a single, perhaps another two or three years later, and then a full album five, six or seven years later.
I’m talking about artistes like Michael Jackson, Janet Jackson, and many others who built careers on quality, creativity and longevity—not on churning out music simply to satisfy a yearly quota.
Yet somehow, in Antigua, we seem determined to create rules and expectations that can actually discourage creativity rather than cultivate it.
The rule says that once a song has not competed in a competition, the artiste can use it. Personally, I have no issue with that. What I DO have an issue with is what we are putting out there now and calling Carnival festivities. Ah dat aryou fu study and work at—bringing Antigua’s Carnival back to its glory days! And let's stop pretending that the downfall of our Festival started yesterday. The decline has been happening for years. It started with poor management, and unfortunately, in many respects, the management has gotten even worse. Add to those concerns about bad judging, and we have to ask ourselves how much longer we are going to ignore the real problems.
The removal of the Female Calypso Competition was a major blow to our cultural development and to the opportunities available to our female calypsonians. Then, to add insult to injury, the decision to remove the two rounds of the Calypso Monarch competition, reducing it to essentially a one-song competition, and moving the competition to Friday night, spoke volumes about where our priorities were heading. These aren't insignificant changes. These are changes to the very events that have helped shape and define Antigua & Barbuda's cultural identity.
And while these cultural components have been weakened, Carnival Week has increasingly become crammed with fetes and shows. That is the problem we should be addressing. Putting individuals in positions of influence over such an important part of our Cultural Identity when their primary focus appears to be on fetes and shows has contributed to the destruction and dilution of what once made our Festival special.
Carnival cannot simply be treated as another entertainment product.
It is our culture. It is our history. It is our music. It is our calypso. It is our masquerade. It is our pageantry. It is our creativity. It is a reflection of who we are as a people.
There is absolutely a time and place for regional artistes in our festival. Of course there is. But the wholesale takeover of our Carnival by outside artistes and entertainment, while our own culture, artforms and local performers are pushed aside or relegated to the margins of Carnival Week, is disrespectful and short-sighted.
And let me be clear: This isn't about being anti-regional. It is about being pro-Antiguan and Barbudan. There is nothing wrong with bringing regional talent to Antigua. But if regional artistes are going to receive the prime platforms, the biggest audiences, the best promotion and the greatest opportunities—while our own artistes are expected to fight for scraps—then we have to ask ourselves:







