Senate Minority Leader and ABWU Deputy General Secretary Senator Chester Hughes delivered a scathing assessment of the government’s handling of the third-country deportee arrangement at Thursday night’s UPP town hall, warning the public that Prime Minister Browne’s posturing as a tough negotiator is fiction — and that the real questions of where deportees will live, how they will be contained, and what happens to Antigua’s already struggling labour market have not been answered.
Senator Hughes, who addressed the Moravian Conference Centre gathering in his dual capacity as a senator and a senior trade unionist, cut through what he described as the Prime Minister’s “fanciful” framing with a blunt assessment that drew applause from the audience.
“America Did Not Negotiate”
Senator Hughes rejected outright the government’s characterisation of the arrangement as a negotiated agreement between sovereign partners. “The government of Antigua and Barbuda negotiated a MOU,” he said. “This MOU, I believe, was given to them. No negotiations. They’re making it sound fancy. America did not negotiate with any of these governments. America told them you’re going to take these persons, and that’s it.”
He said the Prime Minister was “playing fanciful with words” and “trying to show a tough stance, as if he’s being a bad boy to America, but at the same time, every time you hear him speak, he says something different.”
Senator Hughes pointed to the shifting numbers as evidence. “First, the PM is not taking more than 10. Then recently, he’ll accept 16. America is going to send a jumbo jet here, and how much ever come on that plane is what he’s going to take. Let’s get that right first and foremost.”
“Where Are They Going to Live?”
The senator posed the most practical question the White Paper fails to address — one that cuts directly to the daily reality of every community in Antigua and Barbuda. “Where are these people going to stay? Booby Alley? Are they going over to Hodges Bay? Are they coming next to you out there, Creekside? Where are they going to live?”
The question is not hypothetical. Antigua and Barbuda is a small island with finite housing stock, a documented shortage of affordable accommodation, and communities already dealing with the pressures of a rising cost of living. The White Paper, Senator Hughes noted, offers no answer.
The Montserrat Precedent — and the OECS Problem
Senator Hughes drew a pointed historical parallel to the Montserrat volcanic crisis, when the UK government paid Antigua and Barbuda to resettle displaced Montserratians. “How many Montserratians stayed here? They all came and went to London,” he said — a reminder that physical placement in Antigua and Barbuda does not guarantee permanent residence, and that displaced populations with the means to move will move.
He then raised what he described as one of the most alarming gaps in the White Paper — the borderless nature of the OECS. “We have a borderless situation in the OECS. So while we’re talking about just the 14 for Antigua, what about the others who are in St. Kitts, St. Lucia, who are not comfortable there, but find out they can move once they have papers throughout the region?”
The implication is stark: deportees placed in any OECS territory with freedom of movement could end up anywhere in the sub-region, meaning Antigua and Barbuda may ultimately absorb not only its own allocation but individuals transferred to neighbouring states.
The Labour Market: “There Are People Out There Looking for Jobs”








